These figures include demonstration data.

Cyber Behaviour Benchmark

Belgium. This is the live view: it changes as people complete the scan, so it is not for quoting.

Financial services

56
out of 100 · Patchy
16 organisations · 354 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see
53
What people do
63
What people know
49
Belgium: 56 / 65 / 53, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topicSafe surfing and AI level with the national line
Weakest topicInternet surfing 4 below the national line

Where financial services organisations sit

The 13 organisations of the 16 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.
Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.
Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.
Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.
Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.
Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Financial services by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.
Just me
–
2 to 9
–
10 to 49
–
50 to 249
57
250 or more
–
Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (2 organisations, needs 5), 2 to 9 (1 organisation, needs 5), 10 to 49 (4 organisations, needs 5), 250 or more (4 organisations, needs 5).
Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Financial services

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.
QuestionHereBelgiumDifference
Confidential information left in the open7%7%0 level
A colleague's unlocked screen5%6%1 better
A password written down6%8%2 better
Confidential files sent unprotected5%7%2 better
Company information on social media6%7%1 better
Work sent from a private account7%8%1 better
Checking links before clicking15%14%1 worse
Reporting suspicious messages14%14%0 level
Multi-factor authentication11%10%1 worse
Password reuse16%13%3 worse
Anonymising before using AI tools12%14%2 better
Working from a public place15%17%2 better
Forwarding work files to a personal account5%7%2 better
Family or friends using a work device6%6%0 level
Trusted app stores15%12%3 worse
Challenging an unknown visitor13%14%1 better
Backing up critical data16%16%0 level
Reviewing who has access14%14%0 level
Sharing files the approved way17%14%3 worse
Checking AI answers16%13%3 worse
Phone number spoofing44%39%5 worse
Phishing from real accounts44%40%4 worse
Reading a link63%58%5 worse
Spotting the real domain55%53%2 worse
A computer that may be infected58%54%4 worse
What HTTPS does50%47%3 worse
AI chat history41%39%2 worse
Internal or confidential55%55%0 level
An unexpected MFA prompt44%40%4 worse
After denying a prompt53%48%5 worse
Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand