These figures include demonstration data.

Cyber Behaviour Benchmark

Belgium. This is the live view: it changes as people complete the scan, so it is not for quoting.

Healthcare

53
out of 100 · Patchy
16 organisations · 221 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see
51
What people do
61
What people know
44
Belgium: 56 / 65 / 53, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topicPhone security 2 below the national line
Weakest topicInternet surfing 12 below the national line

Where healthcare organisations sit

The 11 organisations of the 16 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.
Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.
Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.
Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.
Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.
Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Healthcare by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.
Just me
–
2 to 9
–
10 to 49
58
50 to 249
–
250 or more
–
Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (3 organisations, needs 5), 2 to 9 (2 organisations, needs 5), 50 to 249 (1 organisation, needs 5), 250 or more (4 organisations, needs 5).
Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Healthcare

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.
QuestionHereBelgiumDifference
Confidential information left in the open8%7%1 worse
A colleague's unlocked screen8%6%2 worse
A password written down7%8%1 better
Confidential files sent unprotected8%7%1 worse
Company information on social media6%7%1 better
Work sent from a private account7%8%1 better
Checking links before clicking19%14%5 worse
Reporting suspicious messages22%14%8 worse
Multi-factor authentication12%10%2 worse
Password reuse18%13%5 worse
Anonymising before using AI tools19%14%5 worse
Working from a public place22%17%5 worse
Forwarding work files to a personal account6%7%1 better
Family or friends using a work device5%6%1 better
Trusted app stores13%12%1 worse
Challenging an unknown visitor21%14%7 worse
Backing up critical data21%16%5 worse
Reviewing who has access20%14%6 worse
Sharing files the approved way22%14%8 worse
Checking AI answers17%13%4 worse
Phone number spoofing43%39%4 worse
Phishing from real accounts52%40%12 worse
Reading a link63%58%5 worse
Spotting the real domain62%53%9 worse
A computer that may be infected64%54%10 worse
What HTTPS does61%47%14 worse
AI chat history49%39%10 worse
Internal or confidential64%55%9 worse
An unexpected MFA prompt49%40%9 worse
After denying a prompt54%48%6 worse
Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand