Insurance

out of 100 · Patchy

14 organisations · 200 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see

What people do

What people know

Belgium: 56 / 65 / 53, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topic	Physical security 1 above the national line
Weakest topic	Phone security level with the national line

Where insurance organisations sit

The 11 organisations of the 14 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.

Exposed, 0-49 · held backPatchy, 50-69 · 6 organisationsAware, 70-84 · held backResilient, 85-100 · none yetHeld back, 5 organisations

Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.

Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.

Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.

Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.

Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Insurance by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.

Just me

–

2 to 9

–

10 to 49

50 to 249

–

250 or more

–

Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (1 organisation, needs 5), 2 to 9 (1 organisation, needs 5), 50 to 249 (2 organisations, needs 5), 250 or more (2 organisations, needs 5).

Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Insurance

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.

Question	Here	Belgium	Difference
Confidential information left in the open	6%	7%	1 better
A colleague's unlocked screen	4%	6%	2 better
A password written down	8%	8%	0 level
Confidential files sent unprotected	9%	7%	2 worse
Company information on social media	8%	7%	1 worse
Work sent from a private account	6%	8%	2 better
Checking links before clicking	16%	14%	2 worse
Reporting suspicious messages	15%	14%	1 worse
Multi-factor authentication	9%	10%	1 better
Password reuse	15%	13%	2 worse
Anonymising before using AI tools	14%	14%	0 level
Working from a public place	18%	17%	1 worse
Forwarding work files to a personal account	6%	7%	1 better
Family or friends using a work device	4%	6%	2 better
Trusted app stores	15%	12%	3 worse
Challenging an unknown visitor	16%	14%	2 worse
Backing up critical data	18%	16%	2 worse
Reviewing who has access	17%	14%	3 worse
Sharing files the approved way	16%	14%	2 worse
Checking AI answers	14%	13%	1 worse
Phone number spoofing	38%	39%	1 better
Phishing from real accounts	39%	40%	1 better
Reading a link	61%	58%	3 worse
Spotting the real domain	55%	53%	2 worse
A computer that may be infected	52%	54%	2 better
What HTTPS does	47%	47%	0 level
AI chat history	38%	39%	1 better
Internal or confidential	54%	55%	1 better
An unexpected MFA prompt	39%	40%	1 better
After denying a prompt	50%	48%	2 worse

Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand