These figures include demonstration data.

Cyber Behaviour Benchmark

Belgium. This is the live view: it changes as people complete the scan, so it is not for quoting.

Manufacturing

62
out of 100 · Patchy
17 organisations · 319 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see
60
What people do
67
What people know
58
Belgium: 56 / 65 / 53, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topicPhishing 5 above the national line
Weakest topicPhone security 2 above the national line

Where manufacturing organisations sit

The 15 organisations of the 17 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.
Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.
Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.
Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.
Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.
Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Manufacturing by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.
Just me
–
2 to 9
–
10 to 49
58
50 to 249
–
250 or more
–
Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (2 organisations, needs 5), 2 to 9 (nobody yet), 50 to 249 (4 organisations, needs 5), 250 or more (3 organisations, needs 5).
Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Manufacturing

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.
QuestionHereBelgiumDifference
Confidential information left in the open6%7%1 better
A colleague's unlocked screen6%6%0 level
A password written down11%8%3 worse
Confidential files sent unprotected7%7%0 level
Company information on social media8%7%1 worse
Work sent from a private account10%8%2 worse
Checking links before clicking15%14%1 worse
Reporting suspicious messages10%14%4 better
Multi-factor authentication11%10%1 worse
Password reuse10%13%3 better
Anonymising before using AI tools11%14%3 better
Working from a public place17%17%0 level
Forwarding work files to a personal account7%7%0 level
Family or friends using a work device10%6%4 worse
Trusted app stores11%12%1 better
Challenging an unknown visitor11%14%3 better
Backing up critical data13%16%3 better
Reviewing who has access11%14%3 better
Sharing files the approved way13%14%1 better
Checking AI answers9%13%4 better
Phone number spoofing34%39%5 better
Phishing from real accounts37%40%3 better
Reading a link51%58%7 better
Spotting the real domain44%53%9 better
A computer that may be infected51%54%3 better
What HTTPS does45%47%2 better
AI chat history34%39%5 better
Internal or confidential48%55%7 better
An unexpected MFA prompt34%40%6 better
After denying a prompt42%48%6 better
Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand