These figures include demonstration data.

Cyber Behaviour Benchmark

Belgium. This is the live view: it changes as people complete the scan, so it is not for quoting.

Other

62
out of 100 · Patchy
13 organisations · 237 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see
59
What people do
67
What people know
57
Belgium: 56 / 65 / 53, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topicInternet surfing 7 above the national line
Weakest topicPhone security 2 above the national line

Where other organisations sit

The 10 organisations of the 13 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.
Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.
Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.
Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.
Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.
Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Other by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.
Just me
–
2 to 9
–
10 to 49
–
50 to 249
–
250 or more
–
Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (2 organisations, needs 5), 2 to 9 (1 organisation, needs 5), 10 to 49 (4 organisations, needs 5), 50 to 249 (3 organisations, needs 5), 250 or more (3 organisations, needs 5).
Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Other

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.
QuestionHereBelgiumDifference
Confidential information left in the open8%7%1 worse
A colleague's unlocked screen4%6%2 better
A password written down6%8%2 better
Confidential files sent unprotected8%7%1 worse
Company information on social media8%7%1 worse
Work sent from a private account6%8%2 better
Checking links before clicking17%14%3 worse
Reporting suspicious messages14%14%0 level
Multi-factor authentication5%10%5 better
Password reuse11%13%2 better
Anonymising before using AI tools11%14%3 better
Working from a public place14%17%3 better
Forwarding work files to a personal account11%7%4 worse
Family or friends using a work device5%6%1 better
Trusted app stores11%12%1 better
Challenging an unknown visitor10%14%4 better
Backing up critical data13%16%3 better
Reviewing who has access13%14%1 better
Sharing files the approved way13%14%1 better
Checking AI answers9%13%4 better
Phone number spoofing38%39%1 better
Phishing from real accounts37%40%3 better
Reading a link51%58%7 better
Spotting the real domain49%53%4 better
A computer that may be infected47%54%7 better
What HTTPS does40%47%7 better
AI chat history36%39%3 better
Internal or confidential52%55%3 better
An unexpected MFA prompt39%40%1 better
After denying a prompt42%48%6 better
Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand