These figures include demonstration data.

Cyber Behaviour Benchmark

Belgium. This is the live view: it changes as people complete the scan, so it is not for quoting.

Professional services

60
out of 100 · Patchy
20 organisations · 389 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see
56
What people do
65
What people know
55
Belgium: 56 / 65 / 53, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topicPhishing 2 above the national line
Weakest topicAccount segregation level with the national line

Where professional services organisations sit

The 16 organisations of the 20 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.
Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.
Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.
Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.
Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.
Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Professional services by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.
Just me
–
2 to 9
–
10 to 49
65
50 to 249
–
250 or more
–
Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (3 organisations, needs 5), 2 to 9 (1 organisation, needs 5), 50 to 249 (4 organisations, needs 5), 250 or more (4 organisations, needs 5).
Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Professional services

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.
QuestionHereBelgiumDifference
Confidential information left in the open6%7%1 better
A colleague's unlocked screen5%6%1 better
A password written down8%8%0 level
Confidential files sent unprotected9%7%2 worse
Company information on social media8%7%1 worse
Work sent from a private account10%8%2 worse
Checking links before clicking13%14%1 better
Reporting suspicious messages14%14%0 level
Multi-factor authentication8%10%2 better
Password reuse12%13%1 better
Anonymising before using AI tools12%14%2 better
Working from a public place15%17%2 better
Forwarding work files to a personal account7%7%0 level
Family or friends using a work device6%6%0 level
Trusted app stores11%12%1 better
Challenging an unknown visitor12%14%2 better
Backing up critical data15%16%1 better
Reviewing who has access13%14%1 better
Sharing files the approved way12%14%2 better
Checking AI answers13%13%0 level
Phone number spoofing36%39%3 better
Phishing from real accounts38%40%2 better
Reading a link55%58%3 better
Spotting the real domain49%53%4 better
A computer that may be infected53%54%1 better
What HTTPS does43%47%4 better
AI chat history38%39%1 better
Internal or confidential58%55%3 worse
An unexpected MFA prompt35%40%5 better
After denying a prompt47%48%1 better
Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand