Technology

out of 100 · Patchy

19 organisations · 355 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see

What people do

What people know

Belgium: 56 / 65 / 53, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topic	Phone security level with the national line
Weakest topic	Internet surfing 4 below the national line

Where technology organisations sit

The 14 organisations of the 19 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.

131

Exposed, 0-49 · none yetPatchy, 50-69 · 13 organisationsAware, 70-84 · held backResilient, 85-100 · none yetHeld back, 1 organisation

Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.

Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.

Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.

Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.

Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Technology by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.

Just me

–

2 to 9

–

10 to 49

61 50 to 249

56 250 or more

Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (2 organisations, needs 5), 2 to 9 (2 organisations, needs 5).

Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Technology

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.

Question	Here	Belgium	Difference
Confidential information left in the open	7%	7%	0 level
A colleague's unlocked screen	7%	6%	1 worse
A password written down	7%	8%	1 better
Confidential files sent unprotected	8%	7%	1 worse
Company information on social media	8%	7%	1 worse
Work sent from a private account	6%	8%	2 better
Checking links before clicking	13%	14%	1 better
Reporting suspicious messages	13%	14%	1 better
Multi-factor authentication	9%	10%	1 better
Password reuse	10%	13%	3 better
Anonymising before using AI tools	15%	14%	1 worse
Working from a public place	17%	17%	0 level
Forwarding work files to a personal account	6%	7%	1 better
Family or friends using a work device	6%	6%	0 level
Trusted app stores	12%	12%	0 level
Challenging an unknown visitor	14%	14%	0 level
Backing up critical data	18%	16%	2 worse
Reviewing who has access	12%	14%	2 better
Sharing files the approved way	14%	14%	0 level
Checking AI answers	11%	13%	2 better
Phone number spoofing	42%	39%	3 worse
Phishing from real accounts	45%	40%	5 worse
Reading a link	63%	58%	5 worse
Spotting the real domain	58%	53%	5 worse
A computer that may be infected	57%	54%	3 worse
What HTTPS does	51%	47%	4 worse
AI chat history	41%	39%	2 worse
Internal or confidential	60%	55%	5 worse
An unexpected MFA prompt	47%	40%	7 worse
After denying a prompt	51%	48%	3 worse

Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand