Healthcare

out of 100 · Patchy

25 organisations · 402 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see

What people do

What people know

Belgium: 55 / 59 / 50, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topic	Internet surfing 2 above the national line
Weakest topic	Account segregation 1 below the national line

Where healthcare organisations sit

The 19 organisations of the 25 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.

6103

Exposed, 0-49 · 6 organisationsPatchy, 50-69 · 10 organisationsAware, 70-84 · held backResilient, 85-100 · none yetHeld back, 3 organisations

Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.

Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.

Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.

Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.

Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Healthcare by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.

Just me

–

2 to 9

–

10 to 49

57 50 to 249

61 250 or more

Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (3 organisations, needs 5), 2 to 9 (3 organisations, needs 5).

Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Healthcare

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.

Question	Here	Belgium	Difference
Confidential information left in the open	6%	7%	1 better
A colleague's unlocked screen	5%	6%	1 better
A password written down	7%	7%	0 level
Confidential files sent unprotected	5%	6%	1 better
Company information on social media	7%	7%	0 level
Work sent from a private account	8%	6%	2 worse
Checking links before clicking	25%	26%	1 better
Reporting suspicious messages	25%	27%	2 better
Multi-factor authentication	18%	16%	2 worse
Password reuse	24%	24%	0 level
Anonymising before using AI tools	26%	26%	0 level
Working from a public place	24%	23%	1 worse
Forwarding work files to a personal account	5%	6%	1 better
Family or friends using a work device	8%	6%	2 worse
Trusted app stores	25%	25%	0 level
Challenging an unknown visitor	26%	26%	0 level
Backing up critical data	25%	26%	1 better
Reviewing who has access	27%	26%	1 worse
Sharing files the approved way	25%	25%	0 level
Checking AI answers	23%	25%	2 better
Phone number spoofing	41%	43%	2 better
Phishing from real accounts	49%	44%	5 worse
Reading a link	60%	60%	0 level
Spotting the real domain	57%	56%	1 worse
A computer that may be infected	53%	56%	3 better
What HTTPS does	49%	50%	1 better
AI chat history	47%	43%	4 worse
Internal or confidential	57%	56%	1 worse
An unexpected MFA prompt	43%	43%	0 level
After denying a prompt	53%	51%	2 worse

Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand