Insurance

out of 100 · Patchy

25 organisations · 416 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see

What people do

What people know

Belgium: 55 / 59 / 50, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topic	Internet surfing 5 above the national line
Weakest topic	Physical security level with the national line

Where insurance organisations sit

The 18 organisations of the 25 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.

117

Exposed, 0-49 · held backPatchy, 50-69 · 11 organisationsAware, 70-84 · held backResilient, 85-100 · none yetHeld back, 7 organisations

Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.

Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.

Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.

Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.

Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Insurance by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.

Just me

–

2 to 9

–

10 to 49

63 50 to 249

56 250 or more

Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (3 organisations, needs 5), 2 to 9 (3 organisations, needs 5).

Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Insurance

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.

Question	Here	Belgium	Difference
Confidential information left in the open	8%	7%	1 worse
A colleague's unlocked screen	8%	6%	2 worse
A password written down	9%	7%	2 worse
Confidential files sent unprotected	8%	6%	2 worse
Company information on social media	7%	7%	0 level
Work sent from a private account	6%	6%	0 level
Checking links before clicking	29%	26%	3 worse
Reporting suspicious messages	30%	27%	3 worse
Multi-factor authentication	15%	16%	1 better
Password reuse	28%	24%	4 worse
Anonymising before using AI tools	29%	26%	3 worse
Working from a public place	25%	23%	2 worse
Forwarding work files to a personal account	8%	6%	2 worse
Family or friends using a work device	6%	6%	0 level
Trusted app stores	27%	25%	2 worse
Challenging an unknown visitor	30%	26%	4 worse
Backing up critical data	31%	26%	5 worse
Reviewing who has access	28%	26%	2 worse
Sharing files the approved way	26%	25%	1 worse
Checking AI answers	29%	25%	4 worse
Phone number spoofing	43%	43%	0 level
Phishing from real accounts	43%	44%	1 better
Reading a link	58%	60%	2 better
Spotting the real domain	55%	56%	1 better
A computer that may be infected	52%	56%	4 better
What HTTPS does	45%	50%	5 better
AI chat history	40%	43%	3 better
Internal or confidential	55%	56%	1 better
An unexpected MFA prompt	41%	43%	2 better
After denying a prompt	47%	51%	4 better

Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand