Manufacturing

out of 100 · Patchy

33 organisations · 488 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see

What people do

What people know

Belgium: 55 / 59 / 50, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topic	Phishing 1 above the national line
Weakest topic	Phone security 2 below the national line

Where manufacturing organisations sit

The 24 organisations of the 33 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.

7143

Exposed, 0-49 · 7 organisationsPatchy, 50-69 · 14 organisationsAware, 70-84 · held backResilient, 85-100 · none yetHeld back, 3 organisations

Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.

Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.

Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.

Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.

Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Manufacturing by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.

Just me

–

2 to 9

–

10 to 49

61 50 to 249

48 250 or more

Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (4 organisations, needs 5), 2 to 9 (4 organisations, needs 5).

Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Manufacturing

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.

Question	Here	Belgium	Difference
Confidential information left in the open	8%	7%	1 worse
A colleague's unlocked screen	7%	6%	1 worse
A password written down	7%	7%	0 level
Confidential files sent unprotected	7%	6%	1 worse
Company information on social media	7%	7%	0 level
Work sent from a private account	6%	6%	0 level
Checking links before clicking	28%	26%	2 worse
Reporting suspicious messages	28%	27%	1 worse
Multi-factor authentication	15%	16%	1 better
Password reuse	24%	24%	0 level
Anonymising before using AI tools	25%	26%	1 better
Working from a public place	23%	23%	0 level
Forwarding work files to a personal account	7%	6%	1 worse
Family or friends using a work device	7%	6%	1 worse
Trusted app stores	29%	25%	4 worse
Challenging an unknown visitor	27%	26%	1 worse
Backing up critical data	28%	26%	2 worse
Reviewing who has access	23%	26%	3 better
Sharing files the approved way	24%	25%	1 better
Checking AI answers	27%	25%	2 worse
Phone number spoofing	38%	43%	5 better
Phishing from real accounts	41%	44%	3 better
Reading a link	62%	60%	2 worse
Spotting the real domain	56%	56%	0 level
A computer that may be infected	59%	56%	3 worse
What HTTPS does	50%	50%	0 level
AI chat history	44%	43%	1 worse
Internal or confidential	58%	56%	2 worse
An unexpected MFA prompt	44%	43%	1 worse
After denying a prompt	47%	51%	4 better

Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand