These figures include demonstration data.

Cyber Behaviour Benchmark

Belgium. This is the live view: it changes as people complete the scan, so it is not for quoting.

Professional services

56
out of 100 · Patchy
33 organisations · 486 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see
55
What people do
60
What people know
50
Belgium: 55 / 59 / 50, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topicPhone security 2 above the national line
Weakest topicPhysical security 1 below the national line

Where professional services organisations sit

The 25 organisations of the 33 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.
Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.
Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.
Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.
Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.
Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Professional services by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.
Just me
–
2 to 9
–
10 to 49
6050 to 249
53250 or more
56
Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (4 organisations, needs 5), 2 to 9 (4 organisations, needs 5).
Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Professional services

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.
QuestionHereBelgiumDifference
Confidential information left in the open7%7%0 level
A colleague's unlocked screen7%6%1 worse
A password written down6%7%1 better
Confidential files sent unprotected7%6%1 worse
Company information on social media6%7%1 better
Work sent from a private account7%6%1 worse
Checking links before clicking22%26%4 better
Reporting suspicious messages23%27%4 better
Multi-factor authentication11%16%5 better
Password reuse21%24%3 better
Anonymising before using AI tools24%26%2 better
Working from a public place23%23%0 level
Forwarding work files to a personal account4%6%2 better
Family or friends using a work device5%6%1 better
Trusted app stores21%25%4 better
Challenging an unknown visitor23%26%3 better
Backing up critical data20%26%6 better
Reviewing who has access21%26%5 better
Sharing files the approved way21%25%4 better
Checking AI answers21%25%4 better
Phone number spoofing44%43%1 worse
Phishing from real accounts45%44%1 worse
Reading a link62%60%2 worse
Spotting the real domain50%56%6 better
A computer that may be infected56%56%0 level
What HTTPS does51%50%1 worse
AI chat history40%43%3 better
Internal or confidential56%56%0 level
An unexpected MFA prompt42%43%1 better
After denying a prompt53%51%2 worse
Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand