These figures include demonstration data.

Cyber Behaviour Benchmark

Belgium. This is the live view: it changes as people complete the scan, so it is not for quoting.

Public sector

56
out of 100 · Patchy
17 organisations · 192 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see
54
What people do
60
What people know
50
Belgium: 55 / 59 / 50, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topicPhone security 3 above the national line
Weakest topicInternet surfing level with the national line

Where public sector organisations sit

The 12 organisations of the 17 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.
Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.
Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.
Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.
Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.
Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Public sector by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.
Just me
–
2 to 9
–
10 to 49
53
50 to 249
–
250 or more
–
Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (2 organisations, needs 5), 2 to 9 (2 organisations, needs 5), 50 to 249 (4 organisations, needs 5), 250 or more (4 organisations, needs 5).
Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Public sector

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.
QuestionHereBelgiumDifference
Confidential information left in the open6%7%1 better
A colleague's unlocked screen4%6%2 better
A password written down9%7%2 worse
Confidential files sent unprotected5%6%1 better
Company information on social media6%7%1 better
Work sent from a private account4%6%2 better
Checking links before clicking24%26%2 better
Reporting suspicious messages28%27%1 worse
Multi-factor authentication12%16%4 better
Password reuse26%24%2 worse
Anonymising before using AI tools21%26%5 better
Working from a public place19%23%4 better
Forwarding work files to a personal account6%6%0 level
Family or friends using a work device5%6%1 better
Trusted app stores21%25%4 better
Challenging an unknown visitor22%26%4 better
Backing up critical data21%26%5 better
Reviewing who has access26%26%0 level
Sharing files the approved way26%25%1 worse
Checking AI answers19%25%6 better
Phone number spoofing45%43%2 worse
Phishing from real accounts44%44%0 level
Reading a link60%60%0 level
Spotting the real domain53%56%3 better
A computer that may be infected55%56%1 better
What HTTPS does52%50%2 worse
AI chat history42%43%1 better
Internal or confidential56%56%0 level
An unexpected MFA prompt35%43%8 better
After denying a prompt53%51%2 worse
Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand