These figures include demonstration data.

Cyber Behaviour Benchmark

Belgium. This is the live view: it changes as people complete the scan, so it is not for quoting.

Retail

58
out of 100 · Patchy
25 organisations · 410 responses

The three things the scan measures

What people see
58
What people do
61
What people know
54
Belgium: 55 / 59 / 50, in the same order.

Against Belgium, by topic

Strongest topicInternet surfing 5 above the national line
Weakest topicAccount segregation 2 above the national line

Where retail organisations sit

The 19 organisations of the 25 here where at least 5 people have finished, so they have a score of their own.
Exposed, 0-49. Safe habits are the exception rather than the rule. What protects this organisation is mostly its technology, not what its people do day to day.
Patchy, 50-69. Good habits exist but they are uneven: strong in some people and some topics, absent in others. A Patchy organisation is not careless, it is unmanaged.
Aware, 70-84. Safe habits are normal for most people most of the time, and the remaining gaps are specific rather than general.
Resilient, 85-100. Safe habits hold up under pressure, including among people who are busy, new, or being rushed by someone else.
Held back. Where fewer than 5 organisations sit in a band we do not give the number, because it would point at particular employers. Those bands are shown together as one segment.

Retail by size

The same group, split by how many people the organisation employs.
Just me
–
2 to 9
–
10 to 49
50
50 to 249
56
250 or more
61
Held back, each needing at least 5 organisations and 20 people: Just me (3 organisations, needs 5), 2 to 9 (3 organisations, needs 5).
Anything held back on the front page stays held back here.

Every question, for Retail

Share of people whose own answer puts them at risk, or who got the knowledge question wrong. Lower is better in both columns. Each question opens its own page.
QuestionHereBelgiumDifference
Confidential information left in the open7%7%0 level
A colleague's unlocked screen6%6%0 level
A password written down8%7%1 worse
Confidential files sent unprotected7%6%1 worse
Company information on social media10%7%3 worse
Work sent from a private account6%6%0 level
Checking links before clicking20%26%6 better
Reporting suspicious messages23%27%4 better
Multi-factor authentication11%16%5 better
Password reuse20%24%4 better
Anonymising before using AI tools23%26%3 better
Working from a public place21%23%2 better
Forwarding work files to a personal account5%6%1 better
Family or friends using a work device7%6%1 worse
Trusted app stores18%25%7 better
Challenging an unknown visitor18%26%8 better
Backing up critical data17%26%9 better
Reviewing who has access17%26%9 better
Sharing files the approved way20%25%5 better
Checking AI answers18%25%7 better
Phone number spoofing40%43%3 better
Phishing from real accounts39%44%5 better
Reading a link54%60%6 better
Spotting the real domain52%56%4 better
A computer that may be infected53%56%3 better
What HTTPS does43%50%7 better
AI chat history40%43%3 better
Internal or confidential54%56%2 better
An unexpected MFA prompt40%43%3 better
After denying a prompt47%51%4 better
Get a report of your own, and for organisations in Belgium see how yours compares on this. Free, about six minutes per person.See where you stand